<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From NAB 2009: Stu Maschwitz, Short Film Shot with the Canon 5D Mark II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hdfilmtools.com/2009/04/from-nab-2009-stu-maschwitz-short-film-shot-with-the-canon-5d-mark-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hdfilmtools.com/2009/04/from-nab-2009-stu-maschwitz-short-film-shot-with-the-canon-5d-mark-ii/</link>
	<description>A Web Video Network for Digital Filmmakers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 12:07:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: D. Thomas</title>
		<link>http://hdfilmtools.com/2009/04/from-nab-2009-stu-maschwitz-short-film-shot-with-the-canon-5d-mark-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-2545</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 05:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdfilmtools.com/?p=1330#comment-2545</guid>
		<description>this is my fear with most of these cameras is they always look like video.  For whatever reason it was better than most shots but still lacked the grading, textures and general feel of a high end feature.  The camera work is good but I would guess it&#039;s in the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is my fear with most of these cameras is they always look like video.  For whatever reason it was better than most shots but still lacked the grading, textures and general feel of a high end feature.  The camera work is good but I would guess it&#8217;s in the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Xavier</title>
		<link>http://hdfilmtools.com/2009/04/from-nab-2009-stu-maschwitz-short-film-shot-with-the-canon-5d-mark-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1558</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Xavier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 02:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdfilmtools.com/?p=1330#comment-1558</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a great tool for indie filmmaking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a great tool for indie filmmaking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larita Maw</title>
		<link>http://hdfilmtools.com/2009/04/from-nab-2009-stu-maschwitz-short-film-shot-with-the-canon-5d-mark-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1532</link>
		<dc:creator>Larita Maw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 06:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdfilmtools.com/?p=1330#comment-1532</guid>
		<description>Hey everybody! Does somebody be knowledgeable about that filmmaker Joseph Fusco? He done the short film titled Chloe A-Z, merely i and my friend just think the guy is in no way notably widley known. We have browse mr. fusco resides here in New York. I want to seek out what various other movies he have created, may anybody offer us a little infos around Joseph Fusco?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey everybody! Does somebody be knowledgeable about that filmmaker Joseph Fusco? He done the short film titled Chloe A-Z, merely i and my friend just think the guy is in no way notably widley known. We have browse mr. fusco resides here in New York. I want to seek out what various other movies he have created, may anybody offer us a little infos around Joseph Fusco?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranjith Kumar</title>
		<link>http://hdfilmtools.com/2009/04/from-nab-2009-stu-maschwitz-short-film-shot-with-the-canon-5d-mark-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1141</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranjith Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 05:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdfilmtools.com/?p=1330#comment-1141</guid>
		<description>Dear friends,

Iam a film maker &amp; cinematographer from Kerela, India.

I would like to know more about canon 5d mk 2 filme.

the process of making the important resources materials is available please send me the links.

i will be great help if any \body can help me please send me a DVD copy in PAL format films shot completely in canon 5d mk2. 

my postal address:

Ranjith Kumar
&quot;Anjana&#039;
Mannumkad Lane
Cherur Post
Thrissur Dist
Kerala - 680008,
India

email: ranjithvedika@gmail.com
hello: 0091 9037730420</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear friends,</p>
<p>Iam a film maker &amp; cinematographer from Kerela, India.</p>
<p>I would like to know more about canon 5d mk 2 filme.</p>
<p>the process of making the important resources materials is available please send me the links.</p>
<p>i will be great help if any \body can help me please send me a DVD copy in PAL format films shot completely in canon 5d mk2. </p>
<p>my postal address:</p>
<p>Ranjith Kumar<br />
&#8220;Anjana&#8217;<br />
Mannumkad Lane<br />
Cherur Post<br />
Thrissur Dist<br />
Kerala &#8211; 680008,<br />
India</p>
<p>email: <a href="mailto:ranjithvedika@gmail.com">ranjithvedika@gmail.com</a><br />
hello: 0091 9037730420</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian Bohm</title>
		<link>http://hdfilmtools.com/2009/04/from-nab-2009-stu-maschwitz-short-film-shot-with-the-canon-5d-mark-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1022</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian Bohm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 18:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdfilmtools.com/?p=1330#comment-1022</guid>
		<description>The MarkII definitely delivers good pictures.

This is a well produced, high energy action piece with great audio. In my opinion, its main shortcoming is the proper use of focus / rack focus. 

There are several places in which the subject is out of focus (e.g. the shot starting at 1:28 is completely out of focus, same at 1:41), as well as situations where rack focus would have been more powerful to convey the action (e.g. at 0:43 and 0:57 new opponents are introduced out of focus). 

Also I have the feeling the blacks are crushed a bit too much, reducing detail, but this could well be an artistic choice or the effect of YouTube compression.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The MarkII definitely delivers good pictures.</p>
<p>This is a well produced, high energy action piece with great audio. In my opinion, its main shortcoming is the proper use of focus / rack focus. </p>
<p>There are several places in which the subject is out of focus (e.g. the shot starting at 1:28 is completely out of focus, same at 1:41), as well as situations where rack focus would have been more powerful to convey the action (e.g. at 0:43 and 0:57 new opponents are introduced out of focus). </p>
<p>Also I have the feeling the blacks are crushed a bit too much, reducing detail, but this could well be an artistic choice or the effect of YouTube compression.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Koenig (Broadcast Assassin)</title>
		<link>http://hdfilmtools.com/2009/04/from-nab-2009-stu-maschwitz-short-film-shot-with-the-canon-5d-mark-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-902</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Koenig (Broadcast Assassin)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdfilmtools.com/?p=1330#comment-902</guid>
		<description>No doubt the Mark II takes a great image, and the Redrock DSLR package (which they apparently used) is gorgeous. I think the main thing holding it back from acceptance is the lack of professional sound acquisition.

Most indie shooters of the digital age aren&#039;t set up to comfortably shoot double system sound. For those who haven&#039;t done it before, the idea of having to post-sync scares the hell out of them, or at the very least the extra steps of slates and jamming/slaving timecode are a deal breaker.

I love this new development, but after the RED/EX-3 generation of camcorders, I think you&#039;ll see the prosumer video market adopt 35mm DoF and lens support (without an adapter) before the 35mm DSLR market is widely adopted for professional video.

And then, of course, they&#039;ll converge and ten years from now (less?) there won&#039;t be a difference between a video camera and a digital still camera, except at the highest of professional price points.

-Jeff Koenig
CEO
broadcastassassin.com
twitter.com/brdcastassassin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt the Mark II takes a great image, and the Redrock DSLR package (which they apparently used) is gorgeous. I think the main thing holding it back from acceptance is the lack of professional sound acquisition.</p>
<p>Most indie shooters of the digital age aren&#8217;t set up to comfortably shoot double system sound. For those who haven&#8217;t done it before, the idea of having to post-sync scares the hell out of them, or at the very least the extra steps of slates and jamming/slaving timecode are a deal breaker.</p>
<p>I love this new development, but after the RED/EX-3 generation of camcorders, I think you&#8217;ll see the prosumer video market adopt 35mm DoF and lens support (without an adapter) before the 35mm DSLR market is widely adopted for professional video.</p>
<p>And then, of course, they&#8217;ll converge and ten years from now (less?) there won&#8217;t be a difference between a video camera and a digital still camera, except at the highest of professional price points.</p>
<p>-Jeff Koenig<br />
CEO<br />
broadcastassassin.com<br />
twitter.com/brdcastassassin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
